The best part here is the snitch whom ratted them out for paying off the trustedhackers is here standing up for them now.
p.s. don’t message me asking whom.
The best part here is the snitch whom ratted them out for paying off the trustedhackers is here standing up for them now.
p.s. don’t message me asking whom.
Something tells me it could’ve been @Ashleigh, who was banned for a year, legitimately asking why there are different sets of rules for different brokers.
Every broker/dealer who hasn’t commented yet:
What I miss?
Paying them off to do what, write good reviews ?
A sizable amount of evidence was uncovered by the community of the broker I’m question utilizing a trusted hackr to steer business in the direction of said broker and purge any unfavorable reviews and mentions of their service. This was a very clear violation of community guidelines.
This forum generates revenue to cover operating expenses from its paying broker members. Many of these brokers saw clear damage to their leasehackr business as a result of the actions described above, and appropriate action was taken by mods to make the forum a fair operating environment.
I’ll waste my 1hr post
I don’t understand why Clutch would have risked all of it. They were consistently one of the most recommended brokers on LH. They didn’t need any TH to help them…
Members and brokers alike went out of their way to suggest their deals…
I’m going to play along in the jumping to conclusion game here. This is utter BS if there is a ban for utter selfish reasons. Besides Clutch being a super professional, he has opened up the West coast to deals that were only available for folks on the east coast. I’ve leased vehicles from the East Coast brokers and paid $2k per vehicle for transport to the West. The brokers have provided a great service to this community along with the trusted hackers and some of the super active non-status’d members that share deals with the community.
Maybe LeaseHackr is in an identity crisis and that’s for the founders to figure out. The community has gone from informing the consumer on leasing, to sharing the best hacked deals, to brokers providing an easy button for a fee. And during the pandemic, a way to take advantage of the supply chain bottleneck to flip vehicles. So whether we are here to LeaseEducatR, LeaseHackR, LeaseBrokR, LeaseFlippR, or just sharing information on the love for cars or how to save a $, it’s a great community. It would be a shame to bust it all up due to other brokers seeing this as an opportunity to eliminate a competitor.
In reality, there will be other ways to hear about Clutch’s deals and I’m sure we will have users sharing on LH. Of course, we will likely see members get banned for it because of individuals claiming the person posting is affiliated with Clutch. My 2cents is “you done f’d it up, boys”.
At this rate, this thread is going to pass the gargantuan behemoth we know as the 4xe by EOD.
Now what to do for an hour…
Please stop making assumptions. I stayed completely silent on the issue.
Edit: oops I read that wrong but yes, I would have wondered why different rules apply to different people.
Removing negative reviews or posts or steering business to get paid is pretty shady… and totally unnecessary. Like an already hall of fame player taking PEDs. Maybe you get an edge but at what cost?
Mistakes happen for any broker or dealer and there were enough raving fans and great deals that I doubt a negative post would have lost them business. We all (for free) rave about the brokers or dealers who take care of us and bitch about the ones who don’t.
If the allegations are true, a one year ban is getting off lightly. The quality of deals he provided is irrelevant
99% of hall of fame players are already taking PEDs
As a dude who’s got no skin in this game (I nor any of my friends and family have used Clutch and we have no affiliation with any broker) I feel like the Mod’s/Cofounders need to reply and set the record straight. All this speculation and limited information is damaging to the community.
I just love the fact that some brokers feel they should lobby for their own best interests because they are contributing towards the revenue of the site. The members are the reason why the brokers and site exist in the first place, and the members will now have one less good resource for information/deals. Who wins and who loses?
The whole “hullaballoo” could’ve been largely mitigated if @michael and @littleviolette were transparent with the community about the issue.
It’s not the crime, it’s the cover-up.