$799/mo… with $3,000 due at signing… for a car that is $14,000 less… with half the mileage per month available…
Wow, I didn’t know you were unable to compare basic lease variables, if I had known that I would have understood why you thought this was a bad deal.
You know what’s funnier, if you took the EZ Deal and put it into a calc, and then modified it to match the OP’s MSRP, it would actually be more expensive, once again proving it is a better deal. Sorry you’re unable to comprehend that.
LMAO do you get a kick out of embarrassing yourself?
Comparing a $68k rear wheel drive X5 for $799 PLUS TAX with $3k at signing versus a $82k car that is $1099 + tax. “this is leasehackr”, pays to know your shit when posting dumb stuff
@IAC_Scott If you look at his history, he goes by the 1% fallacy.
I actually don’t think he’s a troll. I just think he might be a bit dense. And one of those people who likes to crap on deals because he can’t afford them.
Hahahahaahah, so you’ve been proven wrong again, shown you can’t comprehend how a lease works since you compared a 68k X5 to an 82k X5 with half the mileage, and now you AGAIN change your story to “well if it’s such a good deal why has no one taken it?”
Hahahaha, can I hire you for a child’s birthday party? I’ve never met a better professional clown in my life
The fact that you are judging whether a deal is good or bad based on how quickly it transfers over to someone on a lease forum is absurdly funny.
And no one said it’s a “great” deal. It’s a decent deal on this car in today’s market. We are all just reacting to your dumb comment about how it’s worth $800 with $0 down, which you have been proven wrong multiple times. I’m embarrassed for you.
