@mllcb42 got my vote
If there’s already an existing nomination, let’s “like” that post to cast your vote! Makes it easier to count.
I dozed off and wake up to some people saying nice things about me. Am I paying for this?
Still real life. BOO me
As humbled as I am that @Supakimchee would nominate me, can this be like the primaries where I can give @mllcb42 all my delegates and just sway the platform?
Or maybe that was always my way of closing threads, and now I can just close more of them myself?
I don’t think I deserve the power. I just made an explicit screentime category for LH.
Since those that have been nominated are all good choices, and ones I’d choose, I’ll throw out @Mark.ca. Guy knows his EVs and Power
Second this one too
Your feelings for each other are well known. If we could clone Ursus I’d vote for multiples. It’s adorable how he toys with you when you’re wrong.
There aren’t three people on LH politically savvy enough to accurately place my politics, but when the revolution comes I’ll be sure you’re standing next to me and not up against a wall. I’m just glad I lived to see the means of production seize itself.
I would also nominate @Lvs23
Second (dunno why I thought you were)
Second
Multiple reasons I disagree with this post - why nominate someone based on their gender, and there’s a clear conflict of interest since she’s a broker. I do think she provides a lot of value for the forum.
To be fair, I do keep this account 100% separate and do nothing related to brokering on it. I do not even suggest or imply anything about brokering or direct anyone to us from this account.
I’m saying it’s a conflict to be brokering from one account and moderating from another simultaneously.
Wait, wow. I turn away for a sec and there are commies and me in the same sentence?
Thanks for the mention @jeisensc and @XxHaimBondxX !