GAP is for discrepancy between payoff and “market value.” (whatever insurance determines it to be). Cap cost reductions reduce that payoff upfront essentially. I think GAP would not?
That seems like a poor analogy. You don’t put money down because if you wreck your new 330i 20 days after leasing it you lose all the money. It seems like a pretty good rule to follo almost all the time as opposed to not getting in a car because it is “dangerous”
I’m so confused. Putting zero down costs basically nothing. You pay slightly more in interest payments but conversely you are earning a return on the money you hold until you make the higher monthly payment.
This isn’t like not driving or not taking a nap. There is literally no downside to not putting money down. It’s why we always say don’t put money down.
It’s like an absolutely free insurance policy. Why wouldn’t you accept it?