I don’t know what to say if you buy one of these at MSRP when you can get an M340i under MSRP. Apparently, these may be selling for significantly OVER sticker. Baffling. This is not an NSX Lite. It’s just another fat TLX.
The M3/M4 comparison doesn’t make sense. They are well above $800/month and 2 full steps above in terms of class of car. A fully loaded 330i is a better comparison, to be honest. If you care that much about adaptive cruise control. If you don’t, a barebones M340i within $5,000 of a Type S is a steal in comparison.
I’m not saying for the same price but if the Type S is $700 and an M3 is $900 per month your getting $30,000-$40,000 more worth of car in a European luxury brand.
I know for me personally I’d make that swing. Like someone else mentioned it’s probably more so comparable to an M340 but I forgot they existed since the new M’s came out.
It’s a few tenths, if even, faster than a 330i from 0-60. No official time that I can find, but the latest quote from Acura is “around 5 seconds.” An M340i is right around 4.0. A 330i 5.3 as advertised and can get to 5.0-5.1 with a $200 piggyback. Same interior as an M340i. A 330i is MUCH lighter and handles better. The Type S might have a little more at the top end (both limited to 155, requires option on BMW) and slightly better brakes, but I doubt anyone is buying a 4,200 pound Acura for track use.
Keep in mind that BMW’s numbers are understated.
A G70 3.3T is probably the best overall package around $50k.
You’re right about that. Maybe Acura does not want to post these numbers (I am speculating, of course). Motor Trend estimated the 0-60 time to be between 5.3 and 5.8 seconds.