Yeah, I guess so but from what I’ve been told by the hackrs who referred me to Cody, his is the best deal there is in So Cal and he doesn’t budge on price. Other dealerships were quoting me lower sale price but monthly payments over $700/mo (all else being equal)
Unless you’ve got literal poop credit or a ton of negative equity, there’s no way you were getting a $700/mo quote for a lease with a lower sale price.
driveoffs charge against selling price. 40k vehicle can be around 1500 in driveoffs aka dealer discount since they weren’t paid by customer. the money doesn’t disappear.
good deal @Cody_Carter
My credit is 816. I’ve been told that 4Runners “don’t lease well” by several people, including the sales manager at Jaguar where I returned my last lease. And, no, she wasn’t trying to get me in a Land Rover. She was telling me about the great deal she got on her Wrangler lease and had also considered the 4Runner.
He did mention that the sale price was lower, so even if I assume it was only $1 lower. The money factor would need to be marked up to 0.00496 before it hits $700/mo with $0 down (without taxes that is)
I should also mention that other dealerships were quoting as low as 64% RV as well as a higher MF…
I’m just curious, actually, when another person who has recently leased the same car as me (and in SoCal) is going to pop up in this thread and tell me I got completely hosed on this deal.
It seems you know something I don’t. Can you point me to a post on this forum who recently leased the same car in Los Angeles and got a materially better deal?
No need for attention on my part. I was just pointing out that $700/mo+ for a 4Runner of the sale price you posted could only reach that amount with a very very high MF, negative equity or as mp11477 mentioned, many dealer add-ons.