As everyone else is, I am looking into the backdoor way of getting the $7500 cap cost reduction via lease with immediate buyout. However, I need help with basic understanding of how this works.
Will I still be responsible for the Monthly Rent charge for the remainder of the lease? For example, on a Volvo XC90 Recharge 24/7.5K lease - the base MF with MSDs is 0.0028. On a 70K sale price, this equates to a month rent charge of approximately $333. If I buy out the lease immediately and I am still responsible for the rent charge x 24 months, that would mean I’m paying $8000 in interest, which completes wipes out the $7500 taxed incentive.
Is this how it works? Or would I just be responsible for the 1 month of rent charge + depreciation cost of the remaining 23 months?
This is about buy vs lease-then-buy. Isn’t the deprecation there anyway?
Lease-then-buy would have some costs, with benefits of having $7500 EV credit. So the question is, how much the costs are, and whether it justifies the extra work.
My dealer just tried to talk me out if an XC90 lease saying the cap cost reduction of 7500 doesn’t make sense if you’ll keep it for 5+ years…we keep our cars usually 7 years.
I want to capture the $7500 rebate but he’s saying the incentives are washed out through Volvo financial.
If Volvo is offering a subverted (below market interest rate) on a direct purchase and/or has purchase only incentives that might be the case. Just run the math on both scenarios.
As @max_g says, you have to do the math yourself. Th dealer isn’t looking out for you.
Also, and I say this has a very happy XC90 lesee - this isn’t the car I would own for 7 years. Especially not now as we approach the end of the generation 2 production run. The tech is already outdated and the complex small displacement engine is just not one I want off warranty - never mind if you are adding options like the air suspension (which I really like since I don’t have to worry about ever paying to fix it). And that’s some random Internet dude’s 2 cents.