Taxpayers are investors, just most of them are clueless what to invest inš
1 Like
If you canāt see the irony in your last sentence there is no hope for you. How about if internal combustion vehicles which are powered by fossil fuels are a viable technology then investors should be the only ones funding its advancement not the taxpayer.
2 Likes
Sadly with the govt to lobbyist to govt circle jerk this is the case.
youāre just mad you canāt make money on Teslas 
Iāve been a stockholder since $37, Iād say I made plenty. My only mistake was selling off my initial investment at $120. But Iām playing with all house money.
The share price is more irrational now then it was then. Itās almost impossible to invest using fundamentals these days. Itās mindbogglingā¦
5 Likes
Nothing makes sense in the world anymore, why should this?
1 Like
And thatās exactly how I invest now. When your govt prints 10 trillion in fiat itās hard to go wrong putting $ into the casino. I bought lots of gold and silver like any rational investor would. Terrible play
Turning into wallstreetbets. People with steel balls made a shit ton money on Tesla.
This does indeed make me mad. Imagine being a Tesla brokerā¦one could really clean up.
1 Like
How? With Teslaās sales practices of everyone getting the same price (supposedly, and with exception to quarter end pushes), there really isnāt a need for a broker when buying a Tesla. You pay what they say or you look elsewhere.
1 Like
Used Tesla broker.
1 Like
https://www.google.com/search?q=NASDAQ:+TSLA
Stock down $5 this morning to $532, definitely going bankrupt. 
How many lives do you think autopilot has saved vs killed?
4 Likes
Such a dumb debate. Obviously human error is way worse then computers. Even though drunk driving is way down due to Uber/Lyft. Texting deaths prob made up for that.
6 Likes
Funny you say that, Bloomberg has an article about that
It is also valid to cower in fear at the thought of a company beta-testing two-and-a-half ton hunks of metal that may mow over helpless people, which is totally independent of the fuel the car uses for propulsionā¦
4 Likes
Is it?? Probably not. āin no case did Uberās resumption of service result in fewer total injury crashes or serious crashes overall.ā
Agree it can vary city-to-city, but in Austin they saw a big uptick in DUI when Uber was banned
And with assistive technology like current Autopilot, the driver has to be able to take control at any time. You want drunks surrendering control, not sharing it with software.
1 Like
Classic example of FUD: spread fear, uncertainty, and doubt.
Did you read the article? Also funny thing about statistics. They can be used to prove almost anything you have an agenda to prove
3 Likes
What was that quote? lies, damned lies and statistics
1 Like