HACKRS - I need a bit of advice for my scenario. I am from NJ, my daughter is in college in southern California entering her sophomore year this fall. She rents a house with friends and I expect her to be there for the next 3 years. She’s going to need a vehicle and I am looking at leasing a Mazda CX-5, Toyota RAV4, Honda CRV or something similar. My timeline is for her to have something out there at the end of July beginning of August.
I am trying to figure out if it makes more sense to lease something in NJ and ship it to California or just to lease something in California. The first consideration is cost, it appears that it may be cheaper to lease in NJ (taxes, annual registration, maybe programs) then again I will have to fork over the cash to ship it to CA. The other thing to consider is both my daughter and I are NJ residents. I know some brands have lease restrictions for CA residents only. I am not sure, but if she gets a CA driver license I would assume I could cosign for her.
Are there any Hackrs out there who can shed a bit of clarity on this? Your feed back is appreciated.
Depends on your insurance.
My child in College was able to get CA insurance while going to school in NY. I told them specific and as long as she is a dependent on my taxes (and the car is in my name) the CA insurance would work.
Since you are in the opposite range, I would call to see.
The insurance would be the same scenario if registered in NJ. My son goes to school in GA with NJ Plates on NJ insurance. I haven’t considered the cost delta - NJ is pretty expensive - all my neighbors leave their key fobs in their Ranger Rovers, MB etc…
Another case of law vs practice. Unfortunately CA is one of those states that’s really aggressive about collecting their pound of flesh from us tax chattel.