Yes, should’ve added that to my post. W/ German brands, it’s a crap shoot. W/ Toyota, not so much (you are very UNlucky if you get an unreliable Toyota, but you’re just the usual owner if you have one that’s bulletproof).
Not sure if there’s some sort of cultural thing (either w/i the company or at large) that leads the Japanese brands to be more reliable. I think part of it is that the Japanese brands used to do a “superficial” re-skin (inside and out) of their cars every 4 yrs, but the platform itself changed far less freq. So an older, more mature platform presumably has been around long enough to work out the kinks. I also think I read somewhere that the Japanese brands are very aware that many (most?) Americans do not necessarily do a stellar job w/ maintenance and have designed their cars to withstand that kind of neglect. And Toyota is generally pretty conservative w/ introducing “tech” and anything particularly interesting or innovative (hydrogen aside). Which leads them to be very boring. But, again, older tech probably breaks less often.
And, depending on the seat back configuration, you’d be able to fit more into basically every other wagon of a similar size.
Finding specs on-line is a little confusing b/c non-Volvo websites list more cargo capacity for the V60 than does Volvo’s own website. Just in terms of overall cubic feet, you’d fit a bit more into my Golf Sportwagen (a considerably smaller car than the V60) or a LOT more in an Outback (which is only slightly longer) w/ either backseats up or down.
I assumed that VW was maybe exaggerating and I’ve not measured it myself, but, when I looked at the V60 cargo hold at an auto show, it did actually look smaller than my Sportwagen, TBH.
From what I can find on the we, last gen C-Class wagon had less capacity w/ the seats up but more w/ the seats down; apparently ditto on the 3-Series wagon (2018 Mercedes-Benz C 300 4MATIC Wagon: Why Settle for a Sedan? - The Car Guide).
Those are both are RWD platforms and slightly shorter, so I would’ve expected that they would’ve had less cargo capacity, regardless of seatback configuration.
The only wagon of roughly the same size/class that has less space seatback up or down is the A4 Allroad.
So, to me, the V60 is indeed not particularly space efficient compared to other wagons of roughly similar size.
::shrug::