I wouldn’t call a deal with a monthly payment over 1% of the MSRP a solid deal (not to mention the money due at signing). 1% of MSRP as a drive and sign is my definition of a decent deal. And then you have examples of deals at 0.6% of MSRP - I’d call those the stronger deals.
I don’t pay attention to Range Rovers deals, and I don’t think they’re discussed here much. Do you have a recent example of a Range Rover Sport where the lease was 0.6% of the MSRP?
I leased one of these for the Wife a few months back. I am also in Mass it was a grind but maybe 7.5% and if Conquest is still available could do a little better.
It looks like you MF is marked up and you didnt have your govt fees. I am not sure what ytou have at the moment but there is 2K in conquest. I qualified with an Audi Q8 originally.
Here is a calculator at base minus the conquest assuming your 7% discount which is being eaten a bit by the MF markup.
Broken record again and again, because everyone wants to spend 50-100% more on a payment to own and drive the same car for 6-10 years that saw the warranty expire 3-7 years ago once it is paid off and also is worth 25% or less of the purchase price at that point.
Yeah, why not? My last two leases have been closer to 0.5% than 1%. I get it if we are talking about something super unique like a 911, but these mid-tier SUVs are a dime a dozen. Who cares if it is a Range Rover Sport, GLS, X5, LX570, etc.? Take the one with the best lease support and try something new in 2-3 years.
I’ve driven Range Rover Sports. Great cars.
But once you lease a Cayenne, it’s over.
I’ll never go back to Range Rover… unless I go old school and get a classic Defender.