So after reading this forum for a while it seems like there is some disagreement about leasing a Jeep Wrangler.
Assumptions (very loose)
For a 12k/36 mo lease
I see threads here and on Wrangler forums saying it’s a great idea and others saying it’s awful. I can afford to lease for 36 months or finance on a 36 month term to have it fully paid off. I have ~750 credit. I don’t intend to do any modifications and will keep the vehicle in great shape. If I want to get something new / better after 3 years which proposition leaves me in the best position with a mildly optioned Wrangler JL when I am done with it? Does it vary depending on the model and trim? Would a rarer more top-end model have a better RV? I see conflicting information on how well Rubicons hold value etc.