Is it true that when a contract states a higher cost for the CA Tire Fee this is grounds to void the contract?
Example:
If I purchased a car with run-flat tires (no spare) and was charged $8.75 for the California Tire Fee (should be $7.00) this mistake on the dealer’s part would void the contract?
lol what.
Do you have a spare tire? That makes 5… 5x1.75=8.75
(full disclosure - haven’t had a car with a factory spare tire in years…)
@kt-hackr
No.
Does not have a spare tire.
Came with a bottle of foam, like “fix a flat”…
Then you’re due $1.75 back… no, the contract isn’t void. In your paperwork (especially CA), you probably signed something saying errors & omissions can/will be rectified by both parties. I’m paraphrasing but close enough.
Still tryna unwind…
Pretty sure it’s almost always $8.75.
I’ll check my one car that doesn’t have a spare, maybe that one is $7.00?
Leases $900 a month SUV, then complains about $1.75 tire fee
There’s a reason why dealers/salesmen hate shoppers…
Myself and @bimmerm3 are willing to take over your lease if you leave the MSDs, pay an additional incentive and cover shipping so that my effective payment is 99/mo.
Really though, sorry you’re still trying to get out of this deal. Good luck
I’m putting a stop to this before it inevitably gets out of hand. OP, answer is no. Talk to a lawyer if you are this desperate.
