2019 Mercedes C63s Sedan

I just want to look at a 2019 C63s. They wouldn’t let me take any of the numbers home, which seems odd. But the MSRP was 82k. They said they could do 77k. The salesman said they might be able to do 75k. They still wanted $1,573 for 36 months, 10k miles a year, $2,560 down.

I know this is insane. Shouldn’t it be possible to get them close to $1,100 a month?

I saw a deal someone got on mbworld…

2019 C63s
LEASE PROPOSAL
CAP COST $78,450.00
RESIDUAL $45,278.75
MONTHS 36
DECAP $5,734.00
LEASE PAYMENT $947.40
Miles Per Year 10,000
•••••••• Due on Delivery ••••••••
Monthly Payment with Tax $1,022.72
License Plates $1,691.51
Lease Acquisition Fee $1,095.00
Cash Down (inc. Tax) $6,189.85
Total Money Needed $9,999.08

MSRP of the car was basically the same as the one I looked at, 82 and some change. So I’m assuming the one I looked at also had ~$45,278.75 residual. When I run the numbers on that with, the only way I can come up with $1,573 a month is with a money factor of .006! That’s 14.4% O_O

Does anyone know the residual/money factor for these cars?

You can get exact MF and residual numbers from Edmunds, but they will always be terrible for a 63 level AMG. If you want a C63, I suggest buying instead.

Removed post from unregistered dealer.

I just want to know how someone how away with charging $1,700 for tags. Surely they aren’t that high in any state? (Not that I’ve ever seen, at least.)

I think they said that was in AZ.

10k DAS on that car will add nearly $300 to the payment… so its still equivalent to $1400 or so after tax

that said I think both are terrible deals but the C63 does not lease well at all

I’m considering picking up a CPO for hopefully around 55-60k which is what you will pay for 3 years to lease one at that payment

In my opinion this is just stupid. So many other cars for that money. Go lease an m5. About a month ago a broker posted an R8 for that payment.