What? I lease an Audi A4 (a well equipped one, I don’t lease base trim models) for less than a many people lease a Civic for (a regular one like an EX or Touring).
And yeah, I’d say an A4 is “better” than a Civic Si or Type R. I don’t get people’s fascinations with dressed up economy cars.
Comsumer Reports, CFP certified financial planner Dave Ramsey show, Bay Area Consumers Checkbook, Clark Howard Radio show, and my own CPA have said that leasing is a very bad deal financially and you have nothing to show for after the end of lease.
I noticed that the poorest and least educated tend to always lease whereas wealthy people purchase, not lease.
My first new car was an electric and I leased it because it was cheaper (total cost to own ) than buying used with carpool incentives . Now, I am considering to lease an expensive German because I want a new car with new tech and safety features . It is considerably costlier to own compared to 8 year old ones ( I can buy and fix relatively cheap ) . Still trying to convince my financially conservative side…
Cool story bro! I guess my friend who has PHD in marketing and is leasing an Explorer Platinum b/c he got a sweet deal on it, is the antithesis of the person described in your assertion. But we’ll listen to the teachings of grand pooba Dave Ramsey, who makes a living by selling books on how to become less poor to the poor. Fact is, if it makes financial sense to you, do it, wealthy or not.
Your statement said “least educated” (besides poorest), don’t split hairs on it now. Also, do enlighten us on how you consider a well negotiated lease a poor financial decision, and use numbers like @MoneyTime did - since you’re well-versed into the teachings of David Ramsey. You should be able to back up your statements.