Broadly agree except no collusion or concert was required. Initially automakers dipped their toes into the newly established premium SUV market with the first Mercedes ML and Lexus RX, and both of those were home runs. GM and Ford started minting money upbadging their SUVs into Escalades and Navigators.
As soon as everyone saw the success of those, they wanted a piece of the pie.
One more thing on this topic. It sounds like the strikes will happen at transmission plants first. That effectively shuts down the production flow. We’ll see what happens.
Should be interesting. Except for trucks, there are plenty of alternatives to the Big 3 at all price points. As production ramps back up, this only going to make things worse for Ford/GM/Stellantis
The success of expensive SUVs and trucks seems blindingly obvious in retrospect. Some, however, were too ahead of their time. The Lambo LM002, Lincoln Blackwood, etc.
The first G-wagen and P38 RR were quite niche players, nothing near the market size that would later convince Bentley, Rolls and Ferrari to produce hyper expensive SUVs.
X5 and X3 being BMW’s bread and butter seems obvious now. When the first X3 was designed, BMW wouldn’t allocate an assembly line to an unproven vehicle with less interior volume than its contemporary 3-series wagon. It outsourced the assembly to a third party.
Classic Negotiation tactics. Just like him saying Quality is Job 1…
I think the UAW’s reasoning is that with EVs introducing a new manufacturing landscape, where less physical workers are required they’re working towards safeguarding some of the layoffs that will inevitability begin in the future.
UAW is positioned with the upper hand in the short term. Mfgs are positioned with the upper hand long term. Union members need to start saving the minute they ratify their new contracts imo.
In terms of length of strike, who knows. Car market I assume is priced in.