# So much for freedom of speech **URL:** \ **Category:** Off-Ramp\ **Created:** [December 15, 2022, 3:11am UTC](https://forum.leasehackr.com/t/so-much-for-freedom-of-speech/441829 "2022-12-15T03:11:01Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 118
**Author:** ![jay3](https://leasehackr.b-cdn.net/user_avatar/forum.leasehackr.com/jay3/32/209415_2.png) [@jay3](https://forum.leasehackr.com/u/jay3)\ **Post date:** [December 17, 2022, 2:00am UTC](https://forum.leasehackr.com/t/so-much-for-freedom-of-speech/441829/118 "2022-12-17T02:00:28Z")
Serious question- for what purpose would those banned journalists have to publish Musk’s geographic coordinates at any given time? You want to equate banning those who are advocating physical harm to him and his family to a liberal cabal working in conjunction with facets of the US govt to ban an entire ideology, because it poses an electoral threat to their chosen political party? It’s a false equivalence. > [@Ursus](#): > > It wasn’t political and I made it clear Oh sure you did. I must have missed the post where you made it clear. That darn reading comprehension problem again. Nevertheless thank you for starting this thread, it is far more effective at exposing your hypocrisy than I could have ever achieved with my previous topic. > [@Landfilling Procedure](https://forum.leasehackr.com/t/landfilling-procedure/436665): > > There are some TH’ers who arbitrarily and egregiously selectively landfill comments which don’t explicitly violate guidelines, but rather seem to offend them personally. I’ve had multiple comments landfilled by one TH’er (looking at you @ursus) Most recently had one that was a direct response to another comment. Both were admittedly off topic, but were on the opposite sides of the political argument. One got landfilled while the other did not. Has happened many times before and to me is a clear … --- _[View the full topic](https://forum.leasehackr.com/t/so-much-for-freedom-of-speech/441829)._