I played around with it in the calculator and believe their number is right, it’s something to do with the total cap cost and what it includes, you aren’t including something or that net price isn’t including something. When you have the contract in front of you, you’ll be able to reconcile it. Being a 24mo term, a couple hundred bucks will throw the payment off a bunch.
There’s probably some other screen that will give you a net cap cost.
Looking at the sheet again, looks like the net cap cost is 45,216.64.
If you had the contract you could figure it out quick, don’t wait too long, looks like a legit deal.
The attachment has a net cap cost of $45,216.64 and a residual of $36,379.40. Using 24 months and mf=.00057, I get a payment of $414.73 + 6% sales tax is $439.61. So, about $15.55 less per month than they quote.
The residual works out correctly, MSRP = $61,660 * .59 = $36,379.40.
Next, how did they get to the net cap cost. Looks like it is exactly what is in the attachment + first payment of $455.17.
So, the Residual and Net Cap Cost Check Out. The only way to get a payment of $455.17 using the supplied numbers is to use a MF = .00075. I’m guessing that is what they did, which would be a markup of .00018.
Still, the way I read this is $0 upfront which includes first month payment and then 23 remaining payments of $455.17. Looks pretty good to me, the markup is costing you about $15.50 * 24 = $372.
Don’t feel guilty, play the lower dealer against the other dealer. See if the other dealers numbers match up better and keep grinding, never feel guilty grinding these dealers, especially an FCA dealer. You have no idea what kind of things they have done to people. Dodge Journey’s come to mind at 21.99% APR.