Buying Parents Range Rover Velar At End Of Lease - How Does Tax Work? [FL]

,

FL does not from what I could find.

I’m sure any half-smart bank knows it’s a sellers market for cars so they have no motivation to lower the price.

And any lower price is independent of the tax situation… one should look for a legal way to avoid double taxation regardless of purchase price

1 Like

That’s an interesting one. I’ve never seen that done before. I’ve seen cosigners added midlease with other services, but not with Chase itself.
:chocolate_bar:

1 Like

I think @EC99 has the most viable solution, gift tax is not at issue here since it’s not a gift anyways.

Question nobody asked (yet) - are you sure you actually want to buy a used RR? My friend’s leased Velar was put out of its’ misery (totaled) four months prior to lease end. All my friend said was (paraphrasing) - please kick me in the nuts if I ever want to lease another RR. That POS left him stranded 6 times in little over 2 years. FWIW, he replaced the Velar with an Aviator.

3 Likes

Adding you to the car seems to make the most sense as others have stated but spitballing here…

With gifting, it’s up to a dollar amount like most the tax exemptions. So couldn’t they purchase it, gift it to you, and only 26k of the 40k would be taxed? I could be speaking out of place tho I don’t have dependents/kids so my experience is limited compared to the others here.

I could be wrong wouldn’t be the first time :slight_smile: heck if two parents gift you $14k each they’re tax free essentially…Too bad they can’t give you half a Velar each :sweat_smile:

The end goal is to buy it for a specific amount. Why does it matter how you get there?

The gift tax, even if applicable, does not usually lead to actually owing any tax. For a gift above the 15K exclusion, the excess is applied against the gifter’s $11.58 million lifetime exemption. So unless the gifter has already made lifetime gifts (in excess of the annual exclusions) of more than $11.58 million, no gift tax is owed.

1 Like

Do I really need to explain this? The goal is to save money. Who would look at twice the savings and say ā€œI’m good, I’ll only take one.ā€

But this talk of lower purchase price is all moot. Calling Chase to say ā€œcan you lower the purchase price so I can save on double taxationā€ will get the OP laughed off the phone.

Government taxing every time the same asset changes hands is very unfair in my opinion and borderline robbery in OPs situation. This is one of the rare times California got right : No sales tax within 10 days of lease buyout and resell…

1 Like

Gotcha that makes sense, thanks for that breakdown :nerd_face:

You are over complicating this. He is fine paying $37k plus $3k in taxes. If he can somehow get a $3k discount to make up for the $6k in taxes he would be happy.

Would chase possibly give him a $3k discount so they don’t have to deal with the lease return? I have no clue, but doesn’t seem far fetched, chances are they end up selling it to a dealer for a discount either way.

Edit— After looking at what these cars are selling for used, I agree there is a slim chance he gets a discount.

I had three Chase leases, so I’ll save you 108 months on shenanigans across a couple different brands:

4 Likes

This comes up a lot here. The captive wouldn’t renegotiate the terms of a buyout to their detriment.

Makes zero business sense.

ā€œHi, mr. banker, I know I agreed to our terms back when we signed, but now I don’t want to spend any money, I demand that you take a bigger loss on the car than previously agreed!ā€

This topic was automatically closed 60 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.