Is it still a gamble if the deal is structured so they take over the payments on the inception of the lease while introducing a markup?
Sounds like a way to bypass sales to known exporters now that I think of it.
That or just seems circuitous. If you have a good reliable source of leads who would take such deals, consider working with a sales associate or broker that would pay you for those leads on a per sale basis.
I think what heās trying to do is sub-broker a deal. Get a deal from you, add to it, charge that to a client and get something on the backend. unless Im wrongā¦
exactly!! is that something you think could be possible?
If the broker agrees before, why not charge your āfriendā $500 more than the brokerās usual fee and get it back from the broker once they get paid. What you are trying to do is over complicated.
Scummy
10char
It is never on a monthly basis. The payment to the bank is what it is. A broker, nor you, can change that and pocket the difference. The only way to profit is through an up-front fee paid by either the customer or the dealer. As for you profiting as a non-broker, as was stated earlier, your only choice is a fee paid by the customer direct to you. And it is done all the time. There are plenty of lease swaps being advertised where someone is trying to make a buck through a down payment.
bro the news about the surging inventories in warehouses caught my eye, interesting times
OP should keep in mind, though, that only a few captives/banks actually a full transfer of a lease. And that it can take time. OP does not seem to be in a position to keep insurance on the car in the meantime, let alone make those monthly payments.
You are probably better off asking a āfinderās feeā & connecting the end-user to the dealer/broker (if thatās legal in your state), rather than enter a new lease which you cannot afford. Thereās always a chance youāre stuck with it and then ultimately a repo destroys your credit for years.
Weāll split off a referral bump on a good lead that turns into a sale.