I think we’re talking semantics. They are selling the vehicle to me at MRSP - no market adjustment / premium . Every vehicle is going to have an acquisition fee applied to base MRSP. In this case, it’s $995. The incentive is $750. These are all incorporated into the payment I mentioned above.
As far as MF and mark-up’s, yes, that is going to impact the financing component of the monthly payment, and also baked into my math above.
Them marking up the MF by .0004 and them selling it to you for $1000 over MSRP are the exact same thing.
The problem is people look at an at msrp sales price with a marked up mf and think “they are selling the vehicle to me at MSRP with no market adjustment/premium”
Yeah, no one here is saying these guys aren’t making more money on this deal vs. what they would have made pre-pandemic / supply chain challenges (whether through lack of discounts, incentives, squeezing the trade-in value, jacking up the MF, etc.). I am asking whether the terms above are representative of “market” terms today.
And the first step in establishing that is working out what the actual deal is and normalizing the data so you can actually compare against other deals/broker listings/etc.
Looking at the monthly payment doesn’t tell you anything.
Save yourself a lot of trouble and hit the calculator icon in the top right of your browser. Go to Edmunds and find RV/MF data, plug that in along with the MSRP. That alone should let you know what kind of deal you’re getting. It shouldn’t take 3 brokers reiterating themselves.