In the process of finalizing a lease on a 2022 Jeep GC 4xe Trailhawk. Thanks to the info from all the forums, I was able to negotiate a bit and leverage incentives. Im new here, so not sure if this was the best deal or if I should ask for more. How did I do?
Also, the GM agreed that Chrysler had a lower MF than Ally, but that Ally currently lets you utilize an additional $6000 in IDL incentives (not sure if that’s true or not).
MSRP: 68,500
Selling: 65,000
Rebate/Incentives: 18,500
Cash Down: 1,000
Net Cap Cost: 47,894
Term: 39m
Residual: 52%
Did you sign yet? If you didn’t you should not do Ally and you should push for more discount. Discount before incentives should be 8-10% off and Ally will make it very difficult to get out of your lease. Many of us can connect you to dealers who can get you a better discount and more flexibility.
The gm agreed that ally gives them a bigger kickback, so he should push it, regardless of if its in your best interest.
With the standard rate ally lease, you do get more incentives, but not enough to make up for the significantly higher money factor. Youre just paying all of the extra incentives back to them in rent charge.
Thanks for the insight- very helpful! I haven’t signed it yet, so I’ll try and push for more discount up front, and ask to stick with Chrysler instead of Ally.
I’ve been seeing 8-10% off msrp for limited/base 4xe and wasn’t sure if that also applied to the Trailhawk trim
The dealer told me that the $7500 PHEV credit was no longer applicable and that Chrysler recently capped it at $3500. I am 90% sure that’s not true to I called BS. He informed me that it recently changed.
The dealer told me yesterday that the 7500 is still available for lease. Then he told me he does not understand how because the car only qualifies for a 3750 credit lease. I did not want to tell him that the Section 30 purchase tax is separate from the Section 45 lease incentives.
Maybe that’s what he was referring to. So should I bring up that Section 30 is different from Section 45? At this point he’s refusing to apply the $7500 because he claims it’s not applicable.
Update: Now he’s saying I’m right, but instead of showing it as a rebate/incentive, he claims it’s applied towards the MF and residual….that doesn’t sound accurate either.
He says I’ll be able to see it applied on the paperwork…