thanks adamcar in pointing out the one-pay-lease’s return of prorated un-used portions of upfront-monies on GM/Buick leases. Think - also found additional GM’s GAP coverage material : http://www.gmc.com/content/dam/gmc/na/us/english/index/owners/protection/gap-coverage/02-pdfs/GMCGAPCoverageSampleContract.pdf
Also - good point by Fausterion - regarding its only 5% return. I do get 2% cash back on my credit card (I paid by full amount my cash-back credit card). Guess, it makes up additional savings - lets say push it all the way upto 6% savings - tell me who is going to offer 6% CD/bond rate
Now - the fine/delicate dance between GAP insurance how much it covers vs how much remainder value of the vehicle is (short of what your own insurance pays off). To the best of my understanding GAP insurance carrier is fully paid-for by GM Financial (or auto in-house lending arm GM Financial etc), is not different from typical Arbitration clauses of late - guess whom the most of the Arbitration verdicts go in favor of ? The company side, or consumer side!? If you guessed only much-less than 1% verdicts go in favor of consumer - you was right!
Working with your own insurance is hard these days (in event of large/full losses), let alone working with GAP insurance guys (which owe their dues/respect/interest to/of the Lender, than YOU the consumer). Worse yet - now the two insurance Co.s on dueling match how to protect/minimize/deny their respective share of payments. We, as consumer stand much chance? Good luck with that ! Worse yet, there is Arbitration clause layered on-top !!
Just out of curiosity - are there any larger/independent studies done on how/how-well GAP covers, or how smooth (lol, rough!) such process is ? One of Google’s first hit starts off with “The origins of GAP insurance are a little murky—the product has existed for about 25 years” (and not much known about it since) https://www.casact.org/pubs/forum/11wforumpt2/Bowron_Kerper.pdf - go figure!
Like I said - we took calculated chance with OnePay, let alone with non-luxury manufacturer. I know incidents of BMWFS, Lexus FS, and MBFS make you Whole, by returning un-used month’s prorated amounts, in such GAP involving event. Not saying one manufacture in-house lender or their GAP is worse than any other - just the risk of un-known.
Now - if you are upside down on your lease (ie., traded-in previous upside-down car/lease etc, to roll in to current lease; or you expect Car’s depreciation curve significantly worse than whats computed in lease) - I would STAY-AWAY from OnePay murkiness though! In such cases, monthly payments stand better chance … imho.